This is Lili's OLD WEBSITE! Go to for the shiny, better, more up-to-date, awesome version.

21 August 2008

Back to Anthony McGowan

Remember this post about Anthony McGowan's opinions on Pink Books?

Well the post received an anonymous comment that implies it's from McGowan. If it isn't, I sincerely apologise to Mr McGowan. If it is, he should maybe think about being a little less anonymous.

Anyway. I thought I'd just copy the anonymous comment, and my response. FYI*.

Here's what he originally said:

The leathery-skinned hacks who churn out the Pink books present a vision of young people as self-obsessed, shallow, blind automata, swilling about in a moronic inferno. Reading these books will leave your soul as shrivelled as one of those pistachios you sometimes find, blackened, in the bottom of the bag. Teenage girls, read the Brontës, read Elizabeth Gaskell, read George Eliot, read anything else - even Jane Austen - but keep the pink off your shelves.

And here are his response, and my response:

Anonymous said...

In case you didn't notice, all the authors i recommended were women, so cut the white man bullshit. And the author i had in mind was Louise Rennison - read three of her books, as a judge in various competitions. I can't deny there was little of the wind up about the blog, but I'd still stand by every word.

lili said...
Hi "Anonymous",

I would much rather the youth of today read Louise Rennison than anything by the Brontës (the very definition of "self-obsessed, shallow, blind automata, swilling about in a moronic inferno", in my opinion).
And it's a bit rich to dismiss a whole genre based on one author's work. There are some amazing Pink books out there that are challenging, thought-provoking and empowering - Meg Cabot's Ready or Not is an example that springs to mind.

Can you say the same things about your books? Are The Bare Bum Gang books challenging, thought-provoking and empowering for their young readers?

I haven't read them, so I can't say.


Lili Wilkinson.

*Why does this always happen to me? First Frank Cottrell Boyce, now Anthony McGowan.

1 comment:

Snaz said...

Possible reasons Frank Cottrell Boyce and anonymous-who-is-probably-Anthony-McGowan decided to get all fired up in Lili's general direction:

1) Currently out of work and therefore bored

2) Impossibly attracted to her profile photo (and who can blame them)

3) No one will argue with them in person, possibly due to halitosis or because they spit when they get angry (like camels)

4) They are too lily-livered to argue in person (note spelling)

5) They found it totally infuriating that some jumped-up girl/blogger/young author from convict land dared to question their inimitable opinions (hello?! doesn't she know they're famous?!)


6) They lay awake secretly terrified that she might be right.